Reviewer Recognition Policy

The Journal of Agricultural Technology and Food Systems (JATAFS) recognizes that peer reviewers play a vital role in maintaining the quality, integrity, and credibility of scholarly publishing. The journal greatly values the time, expertise, and constructive feedback provided by reviewers.

JATAFS is committed to appropriately recognizing reviewer contributions while maintaining the confidentiality and integrity of the peer review process.

This policy is consistent with the recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and international best practices in scholarly publishing.

────────────────────────────────────────

1. Purpose

The objectives of this policy are to:

  • Acknowledge the valuable contributions of peer reviewers.

  • Encourage high-quality and ethical peer review.

  • Promote academic service and professional development.

  • Maintain reviewer confidentiality.

  • Foster a culture of excellence in scholarly publishing.

────────────────────────────────────────

2. Scope

This policy applies to all reviewers who participate in the editorial and peer review process for manuscripts submitted to JATAFS.

────────────────────────────────────────

3. Recognition of Reviewer Contributions

JATAFS may recognize reviewer contributions through one or more of the following methods:

  • Reviewer acknowledgement certificates.

  • Annual publication of reviewer names (with reviewer consent).

  • Letters of appreciation upon request.

  • Recognition of outstanding reviewers.

  • Confirmation of completed peer review activities.

  • Integration with reviewer recognition services, where applicable.

Recognition will always be provided in a manner that preserves the confidentiality of the peer review process.

────────────────────────────────────────

4. Reviewer Confidentiality

JATAFS operates a double-anonymous peer review process.

Accordingly:

  • Reviewer identities are not disclosed to authors.

  • Author identities are not disclosed to reviewers.

  • Review reports remain confidential unless otherwise specified by the journal.

  • Recognition activities will not identify which manuscripts were reviewed.

Reviewer confidentiality will be maintained in accordance with the journal's Peer Review Policy.

────────────────────────────────────────

5. Reviewer Certificates

Upon successful completion of a peer review, reviewers may request an electronic certificate of recognition.

Certificates may include:

  • Reviewer's name.

  • Journal name.

  • Year of review.

  • Statement of appreciation.

  • Signature or authorization from the Editorial Office.

Certificates acknowledge scholarly service and may be used for academic or professional purposes.

────────────────────────────────────────

6. Outstanding Reviewer Recognition

The Editorial Board may periodically recognize reviewers who have demonstrated exceptional contributions based on factors such as:

  • Timeliness of reviews.

  • Quality and constructiveness of review reports.

  • Scientific expertise.

  • Professionalism.

  • Commitment to ethical peer review.

Selection of outstanding reviewers is at the discretion of the Editorial Office.

────────────────────────────────────────

7. Responsibilities of Reviewers

Reviewers are expected to:

  • Provide objective and constructive evaluations.

  • Maintain confidentiality.

  • Declare conflicts of interest.

  • Complete reviews within agreed timelines.

  • Comply with the journal's ethical standards.

Reviewer recognition does not exempt reviewers from these professional responsibilities.

────────────────────────────────────────

8. Responsibilities of the Editorial Office

The Editorial Office is responsible for:

  • Maintaining accurate reviewer records.

  • Issuing reviewer certificates where appropriate.

  • Protecting reviewer confidentiality.

  • Administering reviewer recognition activities fairly and transparently.

  • Promoting ethical peer review practices.

────────────────────────────────────────

9. Policy Review

This policy will be reviewed periodically to ensure alignment with evolving international publishing standards and reviewer recognition practices.

Updates may reflect guidance from COPE and other recognized scholarly publishing organizations.

────────────────────────────────────────

10. Commitment to Reviewer Excellence

The Journal of Agricultural Technology and Food Systems (JATAFS) sincerely appreciates the invaluable contributions of its peer reviewers.

By recognizing reviewer service while preserving the confidentiality and integrity of the peer review process, JATAFS aims to foster a collaborative, ethical, and high-quality scholarly publishing environment that advances artificial intelligence, integrative medicine, biomedical sciences, and healthcare worldwide.